[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012220135.56766.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:35:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep
On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:13:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Well, the _solution_ is to get rid of the legacy stuff from those buses in the
> > first place. Then, they'll just need to use the generic ops without any
> > trouble.
>
> > What you're proposing is a workaround that people will use as an excuse for
> > not doing the right thing forever.
>
> I hadn't actually realised that there was any urgency about removing the
> old APIs - I'd not really seen much work in that direction. If the
> intention is to actively push people over to dev_pm_ops that does make a
> bit more sense.
There's no urgency strictly speaking, but there's a preference. :-)
I think it probably is the time to actually start pushing people into that,
because the legacy stuff has been causing too much pain recently.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists