[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293007459.3998.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:44:19 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/10] xen/mmu: Add the notion of
IDENTITY_P2M_ENTRY.
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:37 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> P.S.
> We cannot set the IDENTITY_P2M_ENTRY in the P2M tree. This is b/c
> the toolstack considers that invalid and would abort during
> migration of the PV guest.
What do we do instead, just write the actual identity MFN value?
Does using 1UL<<30 (or 1UL<<62 on 64 bit, note that Jeremy recently
fixed FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT too) as IDENTITY_P2M_ENTRY keep the toolstack
happy while still allowing us to distinguish from identity from
happens-to-be-the-same as necessary?
To some extent 1-1 I/O regions could be considered foreign mappings (of
"memory" owned by DOMIO) so perhaps it's possible that setting the
FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT is both sufficient and correct?
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists