linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: Test bus-width for old MMC devices (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5h62umnpxb.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:59:44 +0100
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	zhangfei gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>
Cc:	Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Aries Lee <arieslee@...cron.com>, Qiming Wu <wuqm@...vell.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Test bus-width for old MMC devices (v2)

At Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:56:32 -0500,
zhangfei gao wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Can you please try this diff and see if it works for you.
> >
> > Will do formal patch after your testing.  What card is failing ?
> >
> > Please let me know the manufacturing information so can add card to my test suite.
> >
> > Philip
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > index 1d8409f..77072c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > @@ -558,6 +558,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> >                                         EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
> >                                         ext_csd_bits[idx][0]);
> >                        if (!err) {
> > +                               mmc_set_bus_width_ddr(card->host,
> > +                                                     bus_width, MMC_SDR_MODE);
> Test OK,
> Curious why move here, then mmc_set_bus_width_ddr is called twice in
> fact when ddr=0 &&  (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST)), though
> not impact function.
> mmc_set_bus_width is mmc_set_bus_width_ddr(host, width, MMC_SDR_MODE).

Right.  How about the patch below?  This one just moves the call
before caps test, so it's simpler (and avoiding double calls).


thanks,

Takashi

===
>From b66b9704f8d2fefa402741fb17949224b2766b4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:54:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: fix mmc_set_bus_width_ddr() call without bus-width-test cap

With the bus-width test patch, mmc_set_bus_width*() isn't called properly
when the driver doesn't set MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH and no DDR mode.
This patch fixes the regression by moving the call up before the cap test.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 1d8409f..c86dd73 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -558,6 +558,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
 					 EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
 					 ext_csd_bits[idx][0]);
 			if (!err) {
+				mmc_set_bus_width_ddr(card->host,
+						      bus_width, MMC_SDR_MODE);
 				/*
 				 * If controller can't handle bus width test,
 				 * use the highest bus width to maintain
@@ -565,8 +567,6 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
 				 */
 				if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
 					break;
-				mmc_set_bus_width_ddr(card->host,
-						      bus_width, MMC_SDR_MODE);
 				err = mmc_bus_test(card, bus_width);
 				if (!err)
 					break;
-- 
1.7.3.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/