[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293023945.2170.121.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:19:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, srostedt@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it
actually work something up
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:16 +0000, tip-bot for Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Commit-ID: 14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7
> Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:56:14 -0500
> Committer: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> CommitDate: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:46:59 -0500
>
> tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up
>
> Currently the tracepoint sched_wakeup traces the wakeup event even
> if the wakeup failed to wake anything up. This is quite stupid
> but it happens because we did not want to add a conditional
> to the core kernel code that would just slow down the wakeup events.
>
> This patch changes the wakeup tracepoints to use the
>
> DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL()
>
> to test the "success" parameter and will only trace the event if
> the wakeup was successfull.
>
> The success field in the tracepoint is removed since it is no
> longer needed.
I NAKed this, its stupid.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists