[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101222190108.GE3743@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:01:08 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, fweisbec@...il.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG and
rely on CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:24:52PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Tested with
> > ARCH=i386: allnoconfig, defconfig, allyesconfig, (various broken configs)
> > ARCH=x86_64: allnoconfig, defconfig, allyesconfig, (various broken configs)
> >
> > Hopefully, after this patch I won't get any more compile broken emails. :-)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
>
> There's still some assumptions in the oprofile code, which breaks the build with
> your patch applied:
>
> arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c:394:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘release_perfctr_nmi’
> arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c:403:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘release_evntsel_nmi’
> arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c:419:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘reserve_perfctr_nmi’
> arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c:428:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘reserve_evntsel_nmi’
>
> Config attached.
Thanks. I sent a patch to fix this. Basically they were using
linux/nmi.h instead of asm/nmi.h.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists