linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101224030627.GA9850@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:27 -0500
From:	Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>, davej@...hat.com,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, venki@...gle.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	lenb@...nel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, kent.liu@...el.com,
	chaohong.guo@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand
	governor power efficiency

> Interesting approach, but seems to be quite different from what "ondemand"
> does at the moment. And, as David Niemi pointed out, it seems to be more
> Intel-specific. Therefore, what do you think about adding this different
> algorithm as a different governor, and keep the "ondemand" algorithm more or
> less as it is?

Good suggestion! I will write a different governor soon if nobody
oppose.

Thanks
-Youquan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/