[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8yaaajtd7b9.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:40:58 -0800
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote:
>> My question, then is, should we hold off on getting 8960 support into
>> the kernel until enough things are improved to get rid of the 8960
>> ifdefs? We can certainly do it that way, but it will keep the code
>> out of the kernel longer.
>
> My personal recommendation would be to fix all the places that you
> can do without significant reworks of the existing code, and
> just add TODO comments in the other places, so we can find them
> easily. There is no reason to hold up merging the code too long for
> this, but I wouldn't add code now that I know needs to be changed
> soon to something that can already be done easily.
Sounds like a good plan. I've already started going through the IO
mapping defines to make them not-ifdef based. It's not that significant
of a change. Of course, everyone is on break here who will be able to
test things, so we'll have this stuff early January.
Thanks,
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists