linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Jan 2011 00:33:40 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:04:11AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote:
> > > I'm not sure really what to do about PHYS_OFFSET.  This is kind of the
> > > big thing that has kept us so far from making our SOCs multiply
> > > selectable.  I could move this into a Kconfig option, but it would
> > > still need to be selected by the SOC.  It is unfortunate that most of
> > > our SOCs have different enough memory configurations that these are
> > > mostly different.  Even 8960/8660 will probably have future variants
> > > that are at different addresses.
> > 
> > I think there are people working on relocatable kernels already,
> > and we definitely need this for the other work in progress of
> > doing kernel binaries that work across different SoC families,
> > as well as for doing a single kernel that can be used both for
> > booting the system and for kdump.
> > 
> > You don't need to worry about PHYS_OFFSET at the platform level,
> > we'll get there in a few months for all ARM platforms.
> 
> ... or in a few days even.  I'm currently working on the patch making 
> PHYS_OFFSET patched into the kernel at run time.  I'm currently looking 
> at what is needed to make it work also with Thumb2.

So where do we stand with:

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20101110.175549.62a0b058.en.html

Is this something which should be queued for this merge window?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/