linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1293554355.2371.1.camel@fuzzy>
Date:	Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:39:14 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, nab@...nel.org,
	scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:30:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly]
> > 
> > Changes since 20101227:
> 
> 
> warning: (TARGET_CORE && GFS2_FS) selects CONFIGFS_FS which has unmet direct dependencies (SYSFS)
> 
> from:
> 
> menuconfig TARGET_CORE
> 	tristate "Generic Target Core Mod (TCM) and ConfigFS Infrastructure"
> 	select CONFIGFS_FS
> 
> but CONFIGFS_FS depends on SYSFS, so TARGET_CORE should either depend on SYSFS
> or (eek) it should select SYSFS.

The latter, I think (and actually, configfs should select sysfs).  All
these unmet dependencies are a minefield.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/