[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101228085016.dedc8b18.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:50:16 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, nab@...nel.org,
scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 28 (drivers/target/)
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:39:14 -0600 James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:30:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly]
> > >
> > > Changes since 20101227:
> >
> >
> > warning: (TARGET_CORE && GFS2_FS) selects CONFIGFS_FS which has unmet direct dependencies (SYSFS)
> >
> > from:
> >
> > menuconfig TARGET_CORE
> > tristate "Generic Target Core Mod (TCM) and ConfigFS Infrastructure"
> > select CONFIGFS_FS
> >
> > but CONFIGFS_FS depends on SYSFS, so TARGET_CORE should either depend on SYSFS
> > or (eek) it should select SYSFS.
>
> The latter, I think (and actually, configfs should select sysfs). All
> these unmet dependencies are a minefield.
It's just another language to deal with. Not a big deal, except for the
twists that EXPERIMENTAL injects into it.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists