linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:36:40 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between
 32 and 64bit

On 12/29/2010 02:52 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need 
>> the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes().  I'm not sure why this patchset 
>> is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?
> 
> Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed
> into x86/apic-cleanup.  Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased
> somewhere, let me know.
> 

x86/numa is already a dependent branch (on x86/amd-nb), so I'm fine
merging x86/apic-cleanup into that branch and then if you could rebase
it on top of the new x86/numa then I'll push it out tomorrow.

OK?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/