linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101229105253.GK488@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:52:53 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping
 between 32 and 64bit

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need 
> the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes().  I'm not sure why this patchset 
> is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?

Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed
into x86/apic-cleanup.  Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased
somewhere, let me know.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/