linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101229210045.f583c18d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:00:45 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29

Hi Sedat,

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:54:28 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> What is the recommended way in case of these "comparison" warnings?
> Send to whom/where?

Their respective maintainers (see scripts/get_maintainer.pl), unless you
can also identify the commit that introduced the warning, then you should
also cc author(s),

Thanks
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped