[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101229130802.GA20306@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:08:03 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:45:35PM +0200, Anca Emanuel wrote:
> >> ? MODPOST 2808 modules
> >> ERROR: "__tracepoint_snd_soc_jack_irq"
> >> [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-wm8994.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: "__tracepoint_snd_soc_jack_irq"
> >> [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-wm8350.ko] undefined!
> >> ERROR: "__tracepoint_snd_soc_jack_irq"
> >> [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-88pm860x.ko] undefined!
> >> WARNING: modpost: Found 59 section mismatch(es).
> >> To see full details build your kernel with:
> >> 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
> >> make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> >> make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
> > It would be good if you could publish your config files with these
> > reports. ?I have cc'd this to those who may be able to fix this.
*Please* do always CC maintainers on reports and always include the
config like Stephen requested, build errors without reproduction
information are typically no use.
I've probably fixed this; I've not fully explored this as even a noop
build of the config you provided on my laptop is taking many minutes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists