linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:48:00 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between
 32 and 64bit

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:43:24PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> This has been almost entirely rewritten in x86/numa by c1c3443c ("x86, 
> numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA emulation") and the pending fix 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129340072128297 ("x86, numa: Fix 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS without NUMA").  Since this is only moving those 
> functions to numa.c, it should be trivial to fix once based on x86/numa.

Sigh, the new NUMA emulation thing is 64bit only. :-( I'll see if it
can be applied to 32bit too.  BTW, how does this interact with the
Shaohui's patchset.  Isn't that about NUMA emulation too?  Are these
the same patches?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/