[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101230124800.GD18831@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:48:00 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between
32 and 64bit
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:43:24PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> This has been almost entirely rewritten in x86/numa by c1c3443c ("x86,
> numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA emulation") and the pending fix
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129340072128297 ("x86, numa: Fix
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS without NUMA"). Since this is only moving those
> functions to numa.c, it should be trivial to fix once based on x86/numa.
Sigh, the new NUMA emulation thing is 64bit only. :-( I'll see if it
can be applied to 32bit too. BTW, how does this interact with the
Shaohui's patchset. Isn't that about NUMA emulation too? Are these
the same patches?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists