[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101230113354.GC18831@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:33:54 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping
between 32 and 64bit
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:05:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 11:36 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 12/29/2010 02:52 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> >>> This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need
> >>> the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes(). I'm not sure why this patchset
> >>> is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa?
> >>
> >> Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed
> >> into x86/apic-cleanup. Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased
> >> somewhere, let me know.
> >>
> >
> > x86/numa is already a dependent branch (on x86/amd-nb), so I'm fine
> > merging x86/apic-cleanup into that branch and then if you could rebase
> > it on top of the new x86/numa then I'll push it out tomorrow.
> >
> > OK?
> >
>
> I have pushed out this merge onto x86/numa, so waiting for your rebase.
> If you don't have time, then I'll rebase.
Will rebase & repost soon.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists