[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101230112933.GB18831@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:29:33 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:56:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 07:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >> It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the
> >> address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> >
> > For this and the other x86 patch.
> >
> > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> >
> > I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through
> > the x86 tree, right?
> >
>
> Yes, as long as I can get a stable base to pull into -tip.
I suppose I should take the two x86 and the gameport patches here into
percpu tree with your ACKs too. Would that be okay with you?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists