linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101230112359.GA18831@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:23:59 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use this_cpu_ops to optimize code

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:30:15PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I talked this over with Ingo, and Ingo is really unhappy about making
> -tip depend on the percpu tree ... he says "there are enough problems
> with keeping the dependencies working as it is".  As such, it would be
> better if you could take these patches in the percpu tree, with my ack.

Okay, applied these three.  I suppose the same goes for the newer
patches?  I'll ping you there.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/