| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <849307$b0clt4@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:59:34 +0000 From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de> Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, eric@...olt.net, jesse.barnes@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, gregkh@...e.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix i915 drm regression on AOpen i915GMm-HFS motherboard On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:45:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Knut Petersen > <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de> wrote: > > > > I tried 2.6.37-rc8-git2 with both patches applied. > > I thought Chris meant "instead of", rather than "both". Chris? Right, I was trying to ascertain whether the intel_lvds_ddc_probe() correctly detected the missing panel. That function currently requires GMBUS to differentiate between a NAK and an IO error (bitbanging just returns EREMOTEIO regardless, iirc). So far it has been successful in detecting one false-positive for an AOpen All-in-one and hasn't fouled up LVDS detection for the laptops I have. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists