| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110103162918.577a9620@annuminas.surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:29:18 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kiviti <avi@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Add a yield_to function to the scheduler code, allowing us to
give enough of our timeslice to another thread to allow it to
run and release whatever resource we need it to release.
We may want to use this to provide a sys_yield_to system call
one day.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Not-signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
---
Mike, want to change the above into a Signed-off-by: ? :)
This code seems to work well.
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index c5f926c..0b8a3e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
+ int (*yield_to_task) (struct task_struct *p, int preempt);
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
@@ -1981,6 +1982,7 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *p)
# define rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p) do { } while (0)
#endif
+extern void yield_to(struct task_struct *p, int preempt);
extern void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice);
extern int task_prio(const struct task_struct *p);
extern int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index f8e5a25..ffa7a9d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6901,6 +6901,53 @@ void __sched yield(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
+/**
+ * yield_to - yield the current processor to another thread in
+ * your thread group, or accelerate that thread toward the
+ * processor it's on.
+ *
+ * It's the caller's job to ensure that the target task struct
+ * can't go away on us before we can do any checks.
+ */
+void __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, int preempt)
+{
+ struct task_struct *curr = current;
+ struct rq *rq, *p_rq;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int yield = 0;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ rq = this_rq();
+
+again:
+ p_rq = task_rq(p);
+ double_rq_lock(rq, p_rq);
+ while (task_rq(p) != p_rq) {
+ double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
+ if (task_running(p_rq, p) || p->state || !p->se.on_rq ||
+ !same_thread_group(p, curr) ||
+ !curr->sched_class->yield_to_task ||
+ curr->sched_class != p->sched_class) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ yield = curr->sched_class->yield_to_task(p, preempt);
+
+out:
+ double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ if (yield) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ schedule();
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield_to);
+
+
/*
* This task is about to go to sleep on IO. Increment rq->nr_iowait so
* that process accounting knows that this is a task in IO wait state.
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 5119b08..3288e7c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1119,6 +1119,61 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static void pull_task(struct rq *src_rq, struct task_struct *p,
+ struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu);
+#endif
+
+static int yield_to_task_fair(struct task_struct *p, int preempt)
+{
+ struct sched_entity *se = ¤t->se;
+ struct sched_entity *pse = &p->se;
+ struct sched_entity *curr = &(task_rq(p)->curr)->se;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ struct cfs_rq *p_cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse);
+ int yield = this_rq() == task_rq(p);
+ int want_preempt = preempt;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+ if (cfs_rq->tg != p_cfs_rq->tg)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Preemption only allowed within the same task group. */
+ if (preempt && cfs_rq->tg != cfs_rq_of(curr)->tg)
+ preempt = 0;
+#endif
+ /* Preemption only allowed within the same thread group. */
+ if (preempt && !same_thread_group(current, task_of(p_cfs_rq->curr)))
+ preempt = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /*
+ * If this yield is important enough to want to preempt instead
+ * of only dropping a ->next hint, we're alone, and the target
+ * is not alone, pull the target to this cpu.
+ */
+ if (want_preempt && !yield && cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 &&
+ cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &p->cpus_allowed)) {
+ pull_task(task_rq(p), p, this_rq(), smp_processor_id());
+ p_cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse);
+ yield = 1;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ if (yield)
+ clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
+ else if (preempt)
+ clear_buddies(p_cfs_rq, curr);
+
+ /* Tell the scheduler that we'd really like pse to run next. */
+ p_cfs_rq->next = pse;
+
+ if (!yield && preempt)
+ resched_task(task_of(p_cfs_rq->curr));
+
+ return yield;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/*
@@ -2081,6 +2136,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
.yield_task = yield_task_fair,
+ .yield_to_task = yield_to_task_fair,
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists