[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMK2Ec8SQiRyRBR+MdVKhAmMaaf+oa0VK3wWsf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:35:45 -0600
From: "Kanigeri, Hari" <h-kanigeri2@...com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox
Tejun,
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> With cmwq, there's no reason to use a separate workqueue for mailbox.
> Use the system_wq instead. mbox->rxq->work is sync flushed in
> omap_mbox_fini() to make sure it's not running on any cpu, which makes
> sure that no mbox work is running when omap_mbox_exit() is entered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
> tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.
This was changed to dedicated work queue because of performance issues
when there is heavy mailbox traffic between the cores.
Reference:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg24240.html
>
> Thanks.
>
> arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> index d2fafb8..5bc4d7b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
>
> #include <plat/mailbox.h>
>
> -static struct workqueue_struct *mboxd;
> static struct omap_mbox **mboxes;
> static bool rq_full;
>
> @@ -186,7 +185,7 @@ static void __mbox_rx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
> /* no more messages in the fifo. clear IRQ source. */
> ack_mbox_irq(mbox, IRQ_RX);
> nomem:
> - queue_work(mboxd, &mbox->rxq->work);
> + schedule_work(&mbox->rxq->work);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t mbox_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
> @@ -291,7 +290,7 @@ static void omap_mbox_fini(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
> {
> free_irq(mbox->irq, mbox);
> tasklet_kill(&mbox->txq->tasklet);
> - flush_work(&mbox->rxq->work);
> + flush_work_sync(&mbox->rxq->work);
> mbox_queue_free(mbox->txq);
> mbox_queue_free(mbox->rxq);
>
> @@ -385,10 +384,6 @@ static int __init omap_mbox_init(void)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - mboxd = create_workqueue("mboxd");
> - if (!mboxd)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> /* kfifo size sanity check: alignment and minimal size */
> mbox_kfifo_size = ALIGN(mbox_kfifo_size, sizeof(mbox_msg_t));
> mbox_kfifo_size = max_t(unsigned int, mbox_kfifo_size, sizeof(mbox_msg_t));
> @@ -399,7 +394,6 @@ subsys_initcall(omap_mbox_init);
>
> static void __exit omap_mbox_exit(void)
> {
> - destroy_workqueue(mboxd);
> class_unregister(&omap_mbox_class);
> }
> module_exit(omap_mbox_exit);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Thank you,
Best regards,
Hari Kanigeri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists