lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104092431.GB1886@bicker>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:24:31 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:58:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 08:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > +			WARN("put the && or || at the end of the previous line\n" . $herecurr);
> 
> I've submitted something like this a couple of times and gotten
> various objections but I think it's sensible.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/5/65
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/11/92

If everyone except you thinks it's a waste of time, then stop asking me
to redo my patches.  :/  I don't care either way so long as CodingStyle
and checkpatch reflect the rules.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ