linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to hypervisor.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110104092418.GA31281@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:24:18 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to
 hypervisor.h


* Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 22 December 2010 02:15:44 Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/21/2010 07:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > On 12/20/2010 10:18 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > >  Then we can reuse it for Xen later.
> > > 
> > > You should probably get someone kvm-ish to ack this too.
> > 
> > Looks good to me.
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> Comments?

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

I suspect these patches want to be carried in the Xen tree, right? Shouldnt cause 
too bad conflicts, as long as the Xen tree is pushed after the x86 tree in the merge 
window.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/