linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to hypervisor.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:51:59 +0800
From:	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to hypervisor.h

On Tuesday 04 January 2011 17:24:18 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 02:15:44 Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 12/21/2010 07:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > On 12/20/2010 10:18 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > >  Then we can reuse it for Xen later.
> > > > 
> > > > You should probably get someone kvm-ish to ack this too.
> > > 
> > > Looks good to me.
> > 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > Comments?
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> I suspect these patches want to be carried in the Xen tree, right? Shouldnt
> cause too bad conflicts, as long as the Xen tree is pushed after the x86
> tree in the merge window.

Jeremy?

--
regards
Yang, Sheng

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/