[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104152442.GG19989@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:24:42 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Han Pingtian <phan@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL||RFC 00/11] perf library and regression testing
improvements
Em Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:10:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Ok, The problem comes both files picking up a different verison for
> perf_event.h.
>
> In my case, util/evsel.c was using /usr/include/linux/perf_event.h whereas
> builtin-stat.c was using ../../include/linux/perf_event.h. Both have a different
> struct perf_event_attr.
>
> When I remove the /usr/include/linux/perf_event.h file, then I cannot compile
> perf anymore:
> In file included from perf.c:15:
> util/parse-events.h:7:30: error: linux/perf_event.h: No such file or directory
>
> Looks like something changed in the Makefile and the util modules don't know
> where to pickup perf_event.h
Ouch, all need to use ../../include/linux/perf_event.h, I think, my bad,
checking that.
Thanks for figuring out the issue!
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists