[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikofO8hdT0Ku3xQHPRS6xHQz0W6Z6RY50_DD2FK@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:30:19 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Han Pingtian <phan@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL||RFC 00/11] perf library and regression testing improvements
Just submitted a patch to fix this.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...radead.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:10:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> Ok, The problem comes both files picking up a different verison for
>> perf_event.h.
>>
>> In my case, util/evsel.c was using /usr/include/linux/perf_event.h whereas
>> builtin-stat.c was using ../../include/linux/perf_event.h. Both have a different
>> struct perf_event_attr.
>>
>> When I remove the /usr/include/linux/perf_event.h file, then I cannot compile
>> perf anymore:
>> In file included from perf.c:15:
>> util/parse-events.h:7:30: error: linux/perf_event.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> Looks like something changed in the Makefile and the util modules don't know
>> where to pickup perf_event.h
>
> Ouch, all need to use ../../include/linux/perf_event.h, I think, my bad,
> checking that.
>
> Thanks for figuring out the issue!
>
> - Arnaldo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists