| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTinZbfb0-fwr0QghDfqz13aJVBL=8dUggYeYm48q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:35:00 +0100 From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf: Check if HT is supported and enabled On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:52 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> >> Couldn't you simply over-provision, and then when the CPU is online, use my >> ht_enabled statement to figure out whether or not you need to handle the sharing >> issue? > > That's pretty much what Lin's latest does: > > X86_FEATURE_HT && smp_num_siblings > 1 > > shows the CPU is capable of HT and will allocate the needed resources. > Ok, but once the CPU is online, you can still check whether or not HT is enabled. If not, then you don't need to bother with the MSR sharing code. So you may allocate a data structure which you won't use and I think that's fine given we don't have a good way of figuring out whether HT is enabled or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists