[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110105132856.GB31831@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:28:56 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 5/5] trace event sched: remove TP_perf_assign
* Peter Zijlstra (a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl) wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 18:16 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (trace-event-sched-remove-perf-count.patch)
> > The TP_perf_assign part of 2 scheduler TRACE_EVENT are not used and don't act as
> > TRACE_EVENT fields per se.
>
> Hrm,. they should be used, include/trace/ftrace.h uses __perf_count().
> If it doesn't actually work them something broke.
>
> So NAK on removing them.
Good point, a fresh look at perf's use of __perf_count() shows that the __count
and __addr local variables are acutally used. I'm therefore dropping this patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists