[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D247388.9060302@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:35:04 +0100
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kref: add kref_test_and_get
On 01/04/2011 09:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>>
>> Add kref_test_and_get() function, which atomically add a reference only if
>> refcount is not zero. This prevent to add a reference to an object that is
>> already being removed.
>
> We just removed a function like this recently as it really isn't the
> solution for what you need here at all.
What function are you talking about? kref_set? If yes, I don't see the
similarity between this function and mine.
Regards
Jerome
>
> Please use a lock that protects the desctruction of the kref, like the
> rest of the kernel, to keep someone from grabing a reference while the
> device could be going away. That's the only way to safely do this.
>
> See the archives for why this overall, isn't a good idea for a kref to
> have this type of function.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists