linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf: Optimise topology iteration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1294205040.9261.4.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:24:00 +0800
From:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"Richter, Robert" <robert.richter@....com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf: Optimise topology iteration

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:22 +0800, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Adding Andreas since this is his code.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:06:16AM -0500, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 23:38 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > Currently we iterate the full machine looking for a matching core_id/nb
> > > for the percore and the amd northbridge stuff , using a smaller topology
> > > mask makes sense. 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |    2 +-
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> > > index 67e2202..5a3b7b8 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> > > @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
> > >  	nb_id = amd_get_nb_id(cpu);
> > >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(nb_id == BAD_APICID);
> > >  
> > > -	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> > > +	for_each_cpu(i, topology_core_cpumask(cpu)) {
> > >  		nb = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).amd_nb;
> > >  		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nb))
> > >  			continue;
> > 
> > Borislav, is topology_core_cpumask() the right mask for northbridge_id
> > span? I could imagine Magny-Cours would have all 12 cores in the
> > core_cpumask() and have the node_mask() be half that.
> 
> So, topology_core_cpumask() or cpu_core_mask() both are cpu_core_map
> which represents the socket mask. I.e., on a multisocket cpu you'll have
> in it all the cores on one socket. A 12-cores Magny-Cours contains two
> internal northbridges and this mask will have 12 bits set.
> 
> AFAICT, you want to iterate over the cores on a single node here
> (an internal node in the Magny-Cours case) so for this we have the
> llc_shared_map. See near the top of cache_shared_cpu_map_setup() in
> <arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c> for an example.

cpu_coregroup_mask() seems the right mask for northbridge_id span.

arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:

/* maps the cpu to the sched domain representing multi-core */
const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
{
        struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
        /*
         * For perf, we return last level cache shared map.
         * And for power savings, we return cpu_core_map
         */
        if ((sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings) &&
            !(cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM)))
                return cpu_core_mask(cpu);
        else
                return c->llc_shared_map;
}


> 
> node_mask() is roughly the same but contains correct info only with
> CONFIG_NUMA on and correct SRAT table on the system.
> 
> HTH.
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/