[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110106184747.GG2308@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:47:49 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
nhorman@...driver.com, zhaolei@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace event skb remove duplicate null-pointer check
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:38:02PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@...il.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:15:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:53:19 -0500
> > >
> > > > The check for NULL skb in the kfree_skb trace event is a duplicate from the
> > > > check already done in its only caller, kfree_skb(). Remove this duplicate check.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> >
> > May be you want to take that on the net tree? Looks like more appropriate.
> > Of course this can go through the tracing tree as well.
>
> It might be easier to manage the TRACE_EVENT() reshaping (removal of semicolumn,
> tp_assign, etc) I am preparing if, at this stage, we merge most of the
> include/trace/event patches through a single tree (the tracing tree). Otherwise
> we might end up with more commit cross-dependencies between the trees, and
> increase the risk of conflicts.
Alright, let's take that on the tracing tree.
I'll apply them if Steve doesn't beat me at it.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists