linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 01:58:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling

On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Jan Beulich wrote:

> However, the problem my patch addresses has been long standing
> (I noted it with our .32 based kernel, but according to my looking at
> the code it would go back to at least .27), so I'd like to ask for it to
> be merged independently (and I should probably have copied stable
> too), unless (quite unlikely) Tejun's merge is intended to also be
> applied to stable kernels.
> 

I don't think this should be targeted to -stable since it's not a bugfix; 
this is adding a feature that allows you to disable acpi parsing of the 
SRAT on i386.  Since Tejun's patchset is mature, I think the unification 
should be handled there (if not done so already).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/