[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294417907.16757.1.camel@BR8HFPP0.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:31:47 +0100
From: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Maran Pakkirisamy <maranp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] This patch introduces a new oprofile sample add
function (oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample)
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:34 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.12.10 08:05:44, graalfs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> > From: graalfs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
> >
> > This patch introduces a new oprofile sample add function (oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample)
> > that can also take task_struct as an argument, which is used by the hwsampler kernel module
> > when copying hardware samples to OProfile buffers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maran Pakkirisamy <maranp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> > +void oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample(unsigned long pc, struct pt_regs * const regs,
> > + unsigned long event, int is_kernel,
> > + struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > + __oprofile_add_ext_sample(pc, regs, event, is_kernel, task);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample);
>
> Hmm, I am not convinced of this new interface between the hwsampler
> module and oprofile. It is asymmetric and bloats the function's
> parameters list. A first simplification would be to not implement
> hwsampler as module and integrate this in oprofile. Then, we can look
> for a better way to add samples to the oprofile buffer. What do you
> think?
>
> -Robert
>
Robert, thanks for all the comments. I need to think and discuss this.
-Heinz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists