[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101071234590.31653@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:36:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I like the idea in general, but I think it may collide with Tejun's NUMA
> > unification patchset for x86, which I assume will another revision once
> > the merge window for .38 closes? Or maybe he'd like to merge your patch
> > with his series and push it as one?
>
> Peter, what's the status of the patchset? Is there something which is
> holding it from being merged into x86/numa? Are you simply waiting
> for the rc1 window to close?
>
I don't think it applies cleanly anymore since d906f0eb was merged, but I
agree with Jan that this new feature should probably be merged for .38.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists