linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110107203750.GD7355@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:37:50 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling

Hello, Jan.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:51:09AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I like the idea in general, but I think it may collide with Tejun's NUMA 
> > unification patchset for x86, which I assume will another revision once 
> > the merge window for .38 closes?  Or maybe he'd like to merge your patch 
> > with his series and push it as one?
> 
> I would assume that if unification is done, then the command line
> option would become common too. Tejun?

The unification isn't full and the parameter handling hasn't been
moved yet, so yeah, either your patch can go in first and I can
refresh my series on top of it or vice-versa.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/