linux-kernel - Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1294506729.10091.13.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:12:09 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 14:42 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> >> OTOH you failed to show evidence that super-strict standardization
> >> benefits anyone.
> > I don't need to.
> > If you don't agree with the assertion,
> > facts likely won't change your mind.
> > You'll more likely dispute the facts.
> Sounds like you have the hard facts. Why not let us know anyway?
> > Look up this paper if you care to though:
> > Evaluating the Relation Between Coding
> > Standard Violations and Faults Within and
> > Across Software Versions
> This is apples vs oranges, nobody disputes a need for sensible rules.

Classic example of the disutility of fact based argumentation.

Krzyzstof, let's chat about something like the weather next time.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/