linux-kernel - Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:42:42 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:

>> OTOH you failed to show evidence that super-strict standardization
>> benefits anyone.
>
> I don't need to.
>
> If you don't agree with the assertion,
> facts likely won't change your mind.
> You'll more likely dispute the facts.

Sounds like you have the hard facts. Why not let us know anyway?

> Look up this paper if you care to though:
>
> Evaluating the Relation Between Coding
> Standard Violations and Faults Within and
> Across Software Versions

This is apples vs oranges, nobody disputes a need for sensible rules.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/