linux-kernel - Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26590.1294420352@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:12:32 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:38:38 PST, Joe Perches said:

> http://swerl.tudelft.nl/twiki/pub/Main/TechnicalReports/TUD-SERG-2009-008.pdf
> 
> RQ2 Are files or modules with a higher violation
> density more fault-prone?
> 
> This holds for 10 rules in the standard, with some reserva-
> tions. There is no reliable prediction for files without ac-
> tive development (no changes) nor for files without viola-
> tions. Also, the observed relation becomes less pronounced
> in time, as the number of registered open faults decreases.

In other words, code not written to style is like finding a brown M&M
at a Van Halen concert...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped