lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294671171.26623.240.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:52:51 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	srostedt@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] tracing: Include module.h in define_trace.h

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:14 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > @@ -21,16 +21,6 @@
> > >  #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > 
> > But here we undefine CREATE_TRACE_POINTS, why would this cause a problem
> > in module.h?
> 
> I'm not sure what's happening, all I know is that without this change I
> get:
> 
>   LD      vmlinux.o
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xac0): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_request'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x100): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa40): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_get'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x80): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x9c0): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_load'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x0): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa80): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_put'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xc0): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa00): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_free'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x40): first defined here

Hmm, OK, I'm able to reproduce it when I add:

#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
#undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS

as the first thing in ptrace.c. I'll investigate this further.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ