[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110110182317.GA16694@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:23:17 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG stable, 2.6.32.27] sched: delayed cleanup of user_struct
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >>You can find the logs here:
> >>http://pastebin.com/hNd15E8K
> >
> >Good. Sadly, I didn't see this trace before...
> >
> > kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:287!
> >
> >this matches "INIT_DELAYED_WORK() can corrupt the pending work" I
> >mentioned.
> Sorry to ask this but this could also be "workarounded" by disabled
> GROUP_SCHED? Or is this another thing?
>
> >>>Or. You can revert
> >>> b00bc0b237055b4c45816325ee14f0bd83e6f590
> >>> uids: Prevent tear down race
> >>>
> >>> 3959214f971417f4162926ac52ad4cd042958caa
> >>> sched: delayed cleanup of user_struct
> >>Not sure if it is a good idea to introduce another race again.
> >
> >Which race? b00bc0b237055b4c45816325ee14f0bd83e6f590 fixes the race, yes.
> >But this race was introduced by 3959214f971417f4162926ac52ad4cd042958caa.
> >And afaics the latter commit is optimization...
> >
> >Anyway, this is up to you, of course.
> ah OK sorry didn't get this. Will wait if greg or anybody else can
> tell us something about it.
Tell us about what? I'm totally confused here, what is the problem?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists