linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:14:40 +0100
From:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...tta.com, jj@...osbits.net, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
	jochen@...hen.org, hagen@...u.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 12:52 -0800 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100
> 
> > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of
> > our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use
> > it.
> > 
> > If it will be required in the future it will be implemented.
> 
> We require that you implement the ipv6 side for the submission right
> now.
> 
> Long gone are the days when we add ipv4 only implementations of
> protocols.

If nobody need it and no user in the near future out there, why should i
implement this? That is dogmatic only!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/