[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D2DD5F8.5000200@parrot.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:25:28 +0100
From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@...rot.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: ARM: relocation out of range (when loading a module)
Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:16:38PM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>> It's possible to hack around this by placing the initramfs at the end of
>> the kernel image rather than at the beginning with the rest of the init
>> data. Something like the below should work, although you should also
>> probably take care of alignment and also have this section freed when
>> the rest of the init data is freed.
>
> You're then running into problems as _sdata.._edata is copied to RAM on
> XIP kernels, and you really don't want to waste time copying the
> initramfs to RAM.
>
But in this case initramfs is after edata and before bss.
So where is the problem ?
Matthieu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists