linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101121608560.8212@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:39:07 +0000 (GMT)
From:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for rc1


> IOW, I'm inclined to just do the revert. The "fix" clearly breaks
> things, and now you're adding random parts of the function back rather
> than just calling the "fill_fix()" function like things used to. Why?

Its not the final patch. I'm trying to get feedback on what broke exactly.

> The commit message in dfe63bb0ad98 doesn't support any of these hacks
> - it just seems to say that drm_fb_helper_fill_fix() should also have
> been called from setcolreg().
>
> So why don't we just revert the commit and instead add that
> drm_fb_helper_fill_fix() to setcolreg()?

Fine by me. The real problem is the nouveau driver is using the 
framebuffer device (fb_fillrect) before set_par is ever called.
Before calling set_par the framebuffer state is not defined.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/