linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110113135210.GH30719@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:52:10 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
Cc:	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824
 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:37:22PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >  It seems that dependencies (holders/slaves) between devices is pretty
> >  generic thing. Why do you think that we need claimer-specific method?
> >  The /sys filesystem is better that ictls in many ways.

Also, one more thing.  In btrfs, there's no block device for the
master device.  You can add the slaves directory somewhere and your
choice would be as good as any other's but it just will not be generic
while being superflous exactly the same way it's superflous for md and
dm devices.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/