[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D2F04FF.1070309@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:58:23 +0100
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()
On 01/13/2011 02:37 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, just don't do it. Sysfs is for device hierarchy. Don't try to
> shove pretty looking things there (unless it's something widely agreed
> on and necessary, of course).
Hi,
I think that it is exactly what holders/slaves do - displaying device
hierarchy. So application can check which underlying device are related
and ask them for more info if needed (=> with system specific call,
it can be simple sysfs attribute, ioctl, whatever).
So the only request here is to keep these symlinks correct, nothing more.
Or am I missing anything?
Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists