[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110113141957.1eaf4940@nehalam>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:19:57 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block driver updates for 2.6.38
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:40:09 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> > On 2011-01-13 20:00, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Pekka Enberg (1):
> >>> floppy: replace NO_GEOM macro with a function
> >>
> >> Hmm. When I see work on floppy.c, I end up wondering what happened to
> >> the work by Stephen to use a single threaded workqueue?
> >>
> >> That was reported to fix a KVM oops at some point to to avoiding the
> >> whole race between interrupts/workqueues, but it seems to have dropped
> >> off everybody's radar. I don't think anybody ever tested it on real
> >> hardware, but I'm still wondering..
> >
> > Not sure, I don't recall seeing it.
>
> It was on lkml a few months ago. google finds it with "floppy: use
> single threaded workqueue" if you don't have your own archives.
>
> Eg:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/11/4582074
>
> and similar.
>
> Linus
It looks my floppy format problem wasn't my patch but the HPET-MSI
problem. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69588/
Why hasn't that been fixed in mainline kernel?
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists