linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CacheFiles: Add calls to path-based security hooks [ver #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22056.1294963434@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:03:54 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	tomoyo-users-en@...ts.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CacheFiles: Add calls to path-based security hooks [ver #2]

James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:

> > Add calls to path-based security hooks into CacheFiles as, unlike
> > inode-based security, these aren't implicit in the vfs_mkdir() and similar
> > calls.
> 
> Adding fsdevel for further review - cachefiles is essentially part of the 
> vfs, right ?

It certainly makes good use of the VFS interfaces, so I suppose in that sense,
yes.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/