[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110115142857.GA8610@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:28:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
paul.mckenney@...aro.org, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
weber@...science.de, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/urgent] rcu: avoid pointless blocked-task warnings
* tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org> wrote:
> Commit-ID: b24efdfdf679cf9b05947c531971905fc727dd40
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b24efdfdf679cf9b05947c531971905fc727dd40
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:18:11 -0800
> Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CommitDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:58:08 -0800
>
> rcu: avoid pointless blocked-task warnings
>
> If the RCU callback-processing kthread has nothing to do, it parks in
> a wait_event(). If RCU remains idle for more than two minutes, the
> kernel complains about this. This commit changes from wait_event()
> to wait_event_interruptible() to prevent the kernel from complaining
> just because RCU is idle.
Btw., a sidenote, it's not just about the blocked-tasks lockup detector warning,
uninterruptible sleeps will also artificially inflate the load average of the box,
+1.0 per such task. So it's definitely a bug to sleep for a very long time
uninterruptible.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists