[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110118230936.GD13251@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:09:36 +0000
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: Make OCFS2_FS depend on CONFIGFS_FS
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:16:10PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>
> This patch fixes the following kconfig error after changing
> CONFIGFS_FS -> select SYSFS:
>
> fs/sysfs/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
> fs/sysfs/Kconfig:1: symbol SYSFS is selected by CONFIGFS_FS
> fs/configfs/Kconfig:1: symbol CONFIGFS_FS is selected by OCFS2_FS
> fs/ocfs2/Kconfig:1: symbol OCFS2_FS depends on SYSFS
<snip>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/Kconfig b/fs/ocfs2/Kconfig
> index ab152c0..77a8de5 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> config OCFS2_FS
> tristate "OCFS2 file system support"
> - depends on NET && SYSFS
> - select CONFIGFS_FS
> + depends on NET && SYSFS && CONFIGFS_FS
Isn't this exactly what Linus just said not to do? I don't want
to know that I need to select configfs. Shouldn't it instead just be:
select NET
select CONFIGFS_FS
Linus?
Joel
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists