[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295433498.30950.1482.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:38:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:44 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static void
> +switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> +{
> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +
> + if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> + se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * We switched to the sched_fair class.
> */
> -static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> - int running)
> +static void
> +switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> {
> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +
> + if (se->on_rq && cfs_rq->curr != se)
> + __dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> +
> + se->vruntimea += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +
> + if (se->on_rq && cfs_rq->curr != se)
> + __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> +
> /*
> * We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
> * kick off the schedule if running, otherwise just see
Hrm, I think the to bit is not needed with the from thing in place, the
enqueue from _setprio will already have added min_vruntime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists